Tuesday, March 29, 2022

Antiracist Accountability: How to Ally When Everyone Has an Opinion, or The Slap Heard Round the World

Hey team,

By now, you are likely familiar with the incident involving Chris Rock, Will Smith, and Jada Pinkett Smith at the Academy Awards last night.  

After witnessing such an emotional moment, either contemporaneously or after the fact, you almost certainly have had a visceral reaction, and you may have a resultant opinion you want to express.  God knows everybody else seems to.

If you are a white person and especially if you consider yourself a white ally, this is an excellent opportunity to thoughtfully consider what your role is in this moment of heated public discourse.

If you're open to my opinion, I suggest taking the following steps:

1) Watch this video.

Facebook: @ladyspeech
CW: Completely understandable cursing


2) Check in with yourself and the motivations that inform your opinion.  

If the strength of your urge to police a Black man's behavior is greater than the urge you feel to dismantle the systemic violence that oppresses and murders Black people EVERY DAY, then you are doing racism.  That is an example of what racism looks like.  It looks like being preoccupied with exercising your sense of power and ownership over a Black man's behavior.  It looks like being more uncomfortable with a Black man making his own decisions, which you may or may not understand or agree with, than the harm done by systems that empower and privilege you while harming all Black people.  It looks like minding Black people's business before you mind our own immense amount of business.

Please focus more on your internalized racism than whatever the hell Will Smith did yesterday.


3) Educate yourself.  

Many people are asserting that Chris Rock didn't know about Jada Pinkett Smith's health history, which is the cause of the aspect of her appearance he felt free to ridicule yesterday.

Whether you actually believe that or not is pretty irrelevant, given that the joke is blatantly problematic in several ways (beyond being bizarrely untimely given its reference to a movie from 1997).  His joke was a great (and by that I mean awful) example of punching down, which is a deeply problematic way to use humor.

Let's take stock of the specific ways in which Rock's joke punched down, shall we?  A possibly inexhaustive list:

Take this opportunity to find at least three people who are directly impacted by misogynoir and/or ableism and have commented on yesterday's events and listen to their opinions with an open and curious heart.

NOTE: I am NOT suggesting that you track down a Black person or a person with a chronic medical condition to ask them to educate you about their lived experience.  In fact, I am stridently discouraging you from doing that.  DO NOT DO THAT.

Instead, there are many people who have already shared their opinions on this subject on various forms of social media and news outlets.  Look there.  And don't only look for opinions that confirm your own.

Consider starting with @ladyspeechsankofa's multiple videos on this subject, as they are excellent.


4) Keep your opinion to yourself.

Our sense of entitlement to share our opinions, even on issues that we can't possibly fully understand and that don't directly impact us and even when those opinions can be deeply harmful, is a glaring example of white privilege.  To choose not to exercise that privilege is a practice that we all need more reps in.  Your work is to educate yourself through listening to others.  And also, finally, to:


5) Encourage other white people to follow steps 1 - 5.


{Heart}

Monday, March 21, 2022

We Should All Feel Free to Watch "Free Guy"

Hi team,

I really wanted to write a post this weekend, so given that I've waited until 11:52 pm to start, I'll have to make it quick.  Which is good, and resolutions consistent!

Let's talk about "Free Guy" (2021)!

I had overall low expectations of this movie, accompanied by fragile hopes that it would be genuinely enjoyable and sincere fears that it would be a boring action-fest.  

To cut right to the chase: I loved it!  

In tone and story, "Free Guy" is essentially a live action version of "The Lego Movie" (2014), which of course contributed significantly to my grateful enjoyment.  I am pretty much constantly on the verge of just rewatching "Lego Movie" lately as I am definitely still in a comfort-watching-my-favorite-reruns-as-coping frame of mind, so having another version of that movie means I have a welcome resource to possibly return to at some later date.

To run down the major highlights:

--Ryan Reynolds is great.  His humor is imbued with self-deprecating charm, and he delivers a Jim Carrey in "Truman Show" (1998)-esque plucky yet doe-eyed performance that makes his titular Guy super endearing.

--Absolutely delightful, silly, inventive humor with plenty of laugh-out-loud moments.

--Lil Rel Howery delivers a little homage his save-the-day "Get Out" (2017) moment!

--CHANNING TATUM CAMEO.  You know I love that!!  He is such a goddamn delight.

--Far from being boring, because of the integration of video game-y laws of physics, the action sequences have a fun, cartoony energy that also help reveal the rules of this particular virtual world.

--To that point: As with "Lego Movie", I really enjoyed the world-building of the in-game Free City in "Free Guy".  Something about being introduced to the rules of the road in a low-stakes fantasy environment makes my combined creative and checkbox-checking brains very happy.

In conclusion, "Free Guy" is exactly the sweet, fun, high tech escapist carnival ride I needed and wanted it to be.  With all that and more delivered in this freaking delight of a movie, it is perhaps unsurprising that I gave it a 5.

{Heart}

Sunday, March 6, 2022

"Spencer": The Royal Horror Movie You Didn't Know You Needed

Hi everyone,

I watched "Spencer" (2021) and I'm excited to write about it.

Going in, I didn't have very clear expectations for this film.  I was intrigued to see Kristen Stewart's transformation into Princess Diana and the trailer looked moody and beautiful, and because I'm all out of episodes of "The Crown" and my favorite fact-checking podcast on maligned women, I was very much game to check out this movie.  To my delight and surprise, it quickly became very clear that the film borrowed extensively aesthetically, thematically, and structurally from Stanley Kubrick’s “The Shining” (1980).  

The aesthetic similarities struck me first: gauzy lighting and drab pastel palette, occasionally and jarringly disturbed by lurid splashes of red in the plaid of a jacket or the berry gelĂ©e topping a set of unnaturally perfect desserts in a massive walk-in refrigerator and inevitably evoking bloodshed and harkening back to The Overlook’s elevators, not to mention the legacy of a colonizing monarchy.  

Looking back, the structural similarities are also impossible to miss.  The film opens, like “The Shining”, on the ominous and lengthy trek into the distant location that hosts the majority of its action.  Also similar to “The Shining”, “Spencer” is set primarily in a remote, cavernous, unnecessarily and purposefully cold, expensive yet austere, and almost certainly haunted estate—groaning under centuries of weighty, sometimes terrifying, history—with grounds so vast they could swallow you whole yet not vast enough that you aren’t always, always being watched, either by ill-intentioned spying royal staff or by the place itself.  

Throw in the thematic elements of a main character’s escalating hallucinatory insanity as a direct consequence of brutal, violent, and all-encompassing isolation from the outside world, and you’ve got yourself quite the homage to a giant of horror films.

All of this is to deeply satisfying effect for those of us who love the old horror classic.  It is a mashup I didn’t expect or know I wanted, and yet it is very easily half the reason I like “Spencer”.

A stark counterpoint to the terror constantly nipping at Diana’s heels and the other half of the reason I liked this film is Diana’s moments with her sons.  Here, you see her grounded even as she’s unmoored.  She is playful, creative, vulnerable yet brave, and in deep, fierce maternal love with her boys.  They are her only true oasis in the vast desert of deprivation and cruelty that is her life as a member of the House of Windsor.

It is this love that brings the film to its conclusion, where just like in “The Shining”, the besieged mother faces down the monsters that would destroy her and flees to the safety of reality with her sons.  

And here is a place where “Spencer” crucially breaks with the horror film it references: when Diana interrupts the royal family’s bird hunt in a bid to spare her children from taking part in the bloodshed, instead of seeking to trap Diana and the boys there on the royal estate with him forevermore Charles sends the boys to their mother’s side.  This moment is heartbreaking as it is also exhilarating, as we see in Charles’s granting permission for the boys to go with Diana that he is granting his wife the right to protect her children that his own mother never exercised for his sake and the freedom to flee that he has been denied.  

While the villain of “Spencer” isn’t as honest or blunt as to wield an axe or risk freezing to death pursuing her, the royal family Diana leaves behind is nevertheless frozen in time, doomed to emptily repeat meaningless rituals like well-dressed automatons and eternally kept apart from the real world.  And unlike in “The Shining”, where the mother and child survive, we know that Diana was ultimately not so lucky.  But at least for a blissful moment of fantasy, we see her soothed by the everyday banality of fast food fried chicken and a tourist’s view of London.

While the film isn't perfect, it really is great--especially for fans of unexpected and component allusions to horror classics.  I gave this movie a 4.

{Heart}