Wednesday, June 30, 2010

"Obsessed" with Actually Getting Some Work Done

Hello beloved friends/strangers who might be reading this:

Here goes my attempt a preliminary posting.

So I’ve been home (the where-my-family-lives version) for the last week, and promptly after arriving got the final assignments (somewhat belatedly) for four papers for a summer course I took in hyper-condensed form in May.  The assignments were sent out on June 19th, and they’re due on the 30th.  Usually I'm pretty proud of my writing, but unfortunately given the time contstraints I do not anticipate these papers being my best work.

...In any event, this may give you an indication of whether I’ve done any work on my Master’s lately.

Anyway.

Before leaving for home, I went on a Netflix View Instantly binge.   Among other things, I watched “Obsessed” (2009), starring the fabulous Beyoncé.

Um.... yeah.  Well, I gave it a 1, if that’s any indication of how well that went...

Let’s be honest.  I watched this movie because Beyoncé is both hot and (maybe?) vying to be the next Pam Grier, and with that knowledge I wanted to see the chickfight scene at the end because I knew it’d be amazing.  And it was.   But I also felt like I had to shower after watching the movie, so it was kind of a net negative.

Basically, as far as I can tell, “Obsessed” is an updated version of “Fatal Attraction,” except with the protagonist couple cast African American instead of white.  I was hoping that would make for an interesting twist on an otherwise well-worn tale (much like the incredible performance of Arthur Miller’s “Death of a Salesman” I saw in New Jersey a year or two ago, where the Loman family was African American and the supporting cast was white—not a word of the script was changed, but it added a wonderful new dimension to the story).

Yeah that didn’t happen.  This story is just as banal as it ever was, Beyoncé as would-be jilted wife or no.  The movie is so painfully predictable I started fast-forwarding through the brooding/foreboding husband-driving-places/seductive-villainess-plotting/etc. sequences just so the whole thing would end sooner.

To top it off, my hopes for some glimmer of thoughtful contemplation of race and/or class relations in this miserable little tale were cruelly dashed.  To the contrary, instead of a refreshing, nuanced portrayal of one minority group, the film merely resorted to stereotyping and scapegoating another: the male protagonist, a high-powered executive played by Idris Elba (who I already have mixed feelings about because he was mean to Jim in “the Office”), has a male secretary who is very flamboyantly gay.  Idris calls him a “lady” and everything, he’s *so* officially gay (because all gay men would go for that treatment from a superior in the workplace, right??).  This character unwittingly enables the evil temptress in her evil evil plotting by funneling her gossip about her love interest, helping her successfully invade and almost destroy Elba’s life, all because the secretary is incapable of keeping his mouth shut after being plied with “a few cosmos.”

Sighhhhhhhhhhh.

So let’s get this straight (no pun intended): While *I* was eagerly searching for a hidden progressive discussion of race in this movie, the filmmakers instead switched out what was historically an African American character (the silly, flamboyant, easily-manipulated servant) for a gay man.  Well that feels yucky.  I’m very aware that gay rights are the next frontier of civil rights, but if we could skip the part of this oft-repeated rights-winning process (formerly with women, racial minorities, etc.) where gay people have to be demeaned in film before we can treat them like real people (both legally and in our entertainment), that would be GREAT.

I’m not going to argue that we’re to a point as a culture where members of *any* minority group are consistently treated with equal deference and complexity as white people in movies.  The industry still has a long way to go before they really nail the notion that your movie can have a hero who isn’t white simply because heroes aren’t always white.  No excuses or explanations for their “unconventionality” necessary.

I’m also not going to argue that a group’s portrayal in cinema is the biggest challenge to be overcome on the path to equal rights.  Certainly the rights to marry, equal pay, freedom from discrimination in hiring, etc. are more important than how people like you appear in some crappy movie.  But as someone deeply interested in movies, I believe that images and the stories we tell about ourselves and others matter.   So I wish movies in general and casting decisions in particular could evolve a little, already.

There are certainly counterexamples.  To put in a good word for a favorite genre of mine, both “Night of the Living Dead” (1968) and “28 Days Later” (2002) have brilliantly cool African American heroes/heroines who refuse to offer apologies or explanations for their race.  They simply *are* African American, along with being brave, inspiring, and thrillingly badass.  But again, we have a long way to go before you can consistently count on nuanced, real characters in [non-zombie] movies of every race, sexual orientation, gender, etc.  And I’m getting a little impatient on the matter, as I’m sure many people are.

And with that, my flight back to my other home is descending.  Off goes the laptop!

<3

Sunday, June 27, 2010

A Primer in My Movie Scoring and Progress This Year

Hey kids.

Before I really get started, it probably makes sense to explain my little movie scoring system.  It goes from one to five.  Here is an approximate interpretation:

1: Oh God why??
2: Sighhhh
3: Not bad
4: Very nice
5: Marvelous!

With this key in mind, here is the list of movies I've seen so far this year:

1. Fantastic Mr. Fox (3)
2. Up in the Air (4)
3. Year One (1)
4. Duplicity (1)
5. Bonnie and Clyde (5)
6. 12 Angry Men (4)
7. This Is It (4)
8. Shutter Island (4)
9. Wolfman (1)
10. Alice in Wonderland (1)
11. The Hurt Locker (4.5)
12. Remember Me (0)
13. Bean (3)
14. The King of Kong: Fistful of Quarters (4)
15. Kick-Ass (5)
16. The Tenant (3)
17. Shine (3)
18. Agua Fria de Mar (3.5)
19. Beijing Taxi (3)
20. Dogtooth (3)
21. Twilight: New Moon (1)
22. The Blindside (4)
23. Brothers (4)
24. Extraordinary Measures (1)
25. Surrogates (1)
26. La Vie et la passion de Jésus Christ. 1902. Silent. (3)
27. The Automobile Thieves (incomplete). 1906. Silent. (3)
28. At the Crossroads of Life. 1908. Silent. (4)
29. Old Isaacs, the Pawnbroker. 1908. Silent. (4)
30. The Jacket (2)
31. Obsessed (1)
32. Blindness (4)
33. Please Give (4)
34. Orphan (4)

Disclaimers:
Some of these movies were seen under duress (very very long flights; ex: Twilight: New Moon), because my boyfriend (who I love very, very much) hijacked my Netflix cue (ex: Year One), or because I have some admittedly terrible guilty pleasure genres (ex: Wolfman).  Just... know that I didn't eagerly jump into seeing every single one of these.

I'm in the process of working on a legitimate posting, which will hopefully be finalized shortly.

'Till then!

<3

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Bienvenue!

Hi guys.

So I'm thinking about writing a blog.

The first movie I remember seeing in a theater was "The Land Before Time."  I was 4.  I made it about 10 minutes in, but as soon as the Tyrannosaurus Rex killed Little Foot's mom, I was done.  I threw a massive fit and insisted my parents leave the theater with me.  They weren't happy about it.

Years later, in spite of my early rejection of the medium, I love movies.  While I'm by no means an expert in film, I've taken film classes in undergrad and while I was abroad, and fed my appetite for cinema at a relatively steady pace from the first time I had full command of a Blockbuster/Hollywood Video card in high school... in fact, I skipped a good number of days of high school in favor of watching films.  I've spent a lot of time watching movies, and a lot of time thinking and talking about them.

As an expression of my love of film, I've had the recurring goal of seeing at least 52 movies a year for three years now.  Surely, seeing a movie a week seems like an achievable enough aim to a devotee.  To monitor my progress in this pursuit, I've kept track of every movie I've seen, including ratings from one (oh God why??) to five (marvelous!).  For the first two years of this continuing resolution, I stayed admirably on course.

...And then I started graduate school in clinical psychology.  I majored in psychology (or, according to my undergraduate institution, "Psychological and Brain Sciences"), and have wanted to be a psychologist since I first thought seriously about wanting to be anything.  After a few years out of school, I'm glad to be a student again and grateful to be in a program I (for the most part) love.  I've just finished the first year of my five(ish) year program, and in spite of the obscenities I hurled around midterms and finals, it really wasn't so bad.  It feels great being one step closer to the grown-up life I've wanted for so long.

But.  If you take a look at my "Movies Watched in 2009" list, you'll find a very sad state of affairs.  I barely watched 50% of my 52 movies goal, and that is purely the fault of graduate school.  While I'm back on track so far this year, I figure it can't hurt to add a little extra accountability into my cinematic aspirations.

And so: here is my little blog.  It has two purposes:

1. Keeping track of the movies I watch this year.  I'll include a running tally of movies-seen-to-date to determine whether I'm keeping up with my goal.  I'll write little reviews and keep up with my rating system.  And during busy, new-movie-watchingless weeks, I'll revisit some of my favorites and make recommendations for anyone who hasn't seen them yet.

2. Documenting my graduate life.  I spent so much time thinking about what grad school would be like, and so much energy actually getting here, and yet have recorded very little of my experience over the past year.  I used to be an avid journaler, but have lost the discipline for it.  Hopefully this will be a venue for tracking my progress through graduate school... Not to mention monitoring my work on grad school-related things, like, I don't know, my Master's thesis...?

So really, this is a way for me to ensure I'm devoting consistent effort to two things I love, while sharing pieces of my life with my friends, many of whom are far away.  After all, I feel like these two loves of mine have a lot to do with each other, and a discussion of one will hopefully somehow inform a discussion of the other.  I hope that sounds interesting, and that you have time to check in here every once in a while.

Thanks for reading.

<3