Wednesday, February 23, 2011

The Misery is Over!! Plus a 2010 Choreopoem-Turned-Movie Throw-Back

Hihi.

And the externship hysteria is overrrrr!!  Hurray for everyone!  What a marvelous relief for my classmates and me.  This is one of those moments—rare in graduate school—when we really get to bask in the warm glow of our accomplishments.  Most externships don’t start until June, some (most importantly MINE) don’t start until after Labor Day.  So, unlike most grad school deadlines and milestones, which just necessitate more work immediately after their attainment, my classmates and I can now merely savor the anticipation of the freaking awesome work we’re going to be doing this time next year, without having to bust our asses in the present.  It’s pretty sweet.

In other hyper-awesome news: I’m giving another lecture on Friday (depression and suicidality again, wheeee!), and epic planning is happening for my DISSERTATION.  Oh yes.  I’m so badass that I can’t be satisfied with JUST ONE major research project; I need to work on TWO.  SIMULTANEOUSLY.  (PsychoCinematic insider's tip: A high rate of CAPSLOCK usage is indicative of BARELY SUBLIMATED ANXIETY.  JUST FYI.)

Seriously though, it’s going to be pretty cool.  Details to come.

Moving along: for today’s post, I’m going to do a throwback to a movie I actually saw a few months ago.  While listening to some back-podcasts recently (specifically, back-issues of the absolutely fantastic Michel Martin’s "Tell Me More"), I heard an interview with Ntozake Shange, who wrote the choreopoem “For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Suicide When the Rainbow is Enuf”.  This reminded me of how strongly I responded to the film version, directed by Tyler Perry, with the truncated title of “For Colored Girls” (2010).  Since it was the 52nd film I saw last year, I feel even more obligated to write a little something about the film, however belatedly.

 
First of all, a comment on translating works meant for the stage to the screen: It’s usually a disaster.  One particularly painful and relatively recent example of this was “Doubt” (2008).  I expected it to be spectacular—how can you possibly go wrong with Meryl Streep and Philip Seymour Hoffman??—but, sadly, it fell very flat.

Theater and cinema are in many ways at odds with each other.  Theater is about sharing a space with actors performing a piece that lives, breathes, and is lost the minute the curtain falls.  It’s about movement within a confined space.  Movies, on the other hand, are eternally set one certain way (excluding the occasional director’s cut or alternate ending), and they can be set absolutely anywhere the imagination (with the occasional aid of special effects technicians) is capable of.  If a play is going to be successfully translated to the screen, I feel like these differences have to be acknowledged.  If you shoot a movie of a play without taking advantage of the unique and different strengths of your new medium, it can feel to the audience as if they’re merely watching a recorded version of a theater performance.  This was my experience watching “Doubt,” feeling immensely disappointed.  It’s off-putting.

“For Colored Girls,” I am very pleased to say, does not suffer from this problem.  Much of the film is shot in painfully intimate close-up, lingering on the lovely faces of the women who comprise the film’s rainbow—economizing on a perspective not available to theater-goers seated beyond the first or second rows.  There are also passages of beautiful—and horrifying—movement, recapitulating the movement of actors across a stage.  Furthermore, there are tracts of dialogue recorded in such a way that I could almost taste their flavor, as if they were being spoken in the darkened theater instead of fed through speakers.  Nyla (Tessa Thompson) effortlessly glides over her monologue with a blissful spoken-word rhythm as she dances with her troupe of high school classmates, and Crystal (Kimberly Elise) slowly draws a bottle away from her explosive, alcoholic husband with a painstakingly even whisper.  Indeed, in spite of the movie’s success in moving Ms. Shange’s choreopoem to the silver screen, I’ll admit I found myself hungering for a live performance so I could bathe in her beautiful prose in vivo.  Hopefully I’ll be able to enjoy that sometime.

That particular gold star aside, the film boasts many other successes.  The all-star cast is ever magnetic and watchable, each woman giving voice to often-voiceless aspects of feminine experience.  In her interview, Ms. Shange said she wrote “For Colored Girls” to allow silent women to speak, and in this she expertly, painfully, and powerfully succeeds.  Without ruining critical turns of the plot, I must say this is by far one of the most wrenching films I’ve ever seen.  It marches boldly and unblinkingly through terrain the bravest angels would fear to tread.

As much as it is a validation and ultimate celebration of womanly resilience and strength, “For Colored Girls” is arguably also an encyclopedia of the atrocities of which men are capable against women.  With the film’s concluding loving and healing huddle of women, I was left—perhaps deliberately—unsettled.  While the audience is left reassured that women can find strength and solace in other women, those of us who seek partners in men were probably pretty freaked out.  I know I was.  If men are capable of such barbarity—with no positive male counterpoint to be seen, save one character’s barely-present husband—where does that leave us?

 
In responding to a query about the frightfulness of the male characters in this film, Ms. Elise responded, “If you’re going to examine issues like domestic abuse or rape or anything, you’re going to have a bad guy in the picture.  The point is, these things happen to women.  How do we heal from that?  How do we move on?  How do we strengthen ourselves, and empower ourselves, when we find ourselves in these situations?  And you know, to tell it honestly, you have to go there.”

...Fair enough.

She is, by the way, completely unforgettable in this movie.

Perhaps paradoxically, if anything, this is definitely the kind of movie that made me grateful for all of the men in my life who are gentle, loving, and safe-place making—the man I come home to, the men who are my father, brothers, cousins, uncles, grandfather, and teachers, and the men who are some of my dearest friends.  Even if this particular movie offers no immediate proof of good men, I count myself as immensely blessed to have such a plurality of evidence that they exist.  Thank the Universe for that, or it might have taken me much longer to shake the solemn, heavy feeling in my heart as I left the theater.

That cheery, upbeat review aside, this is definitely one worth watching.  I gave it a 4.

 ’Til next time.

<3

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

"Jurassic Park": Like Grad School, Plus Raptors

A Merry Valentine's Day to you all!

Today is a holiday associated with many well-founded misgivings.  While I'm not unduly obsessed with Valentine's Day, I subscribe to the school of thought that teaches that it never hurts to have yet another excuse to be nice to people you love, to do something special with your partner, and to maybe give them a present.  As far as presents in the PsychoCinematic household go, the rule of thumb is that you can tell how much someone loves you by how big a piece of meat they... buy you.

In my case, I am clearly a well-loved human.  To celebrate Valentine's Day making-a-nice-dinner-at-home style, Boyfriend procured the following impressive slab:

Jeal?
Since Mondays are lame and school/work-filled, we cooked that moo cow up and celebrated yesterday.  It was glorious.  Food comas ensued.  And unexpected tertiary perk: I have time to write a little post today!  So I present to you: my Valentine's Day gift to my beloved blog-reading friends.

True to the spirit of the day, I will be discussing "Jurassic Park" (1993).


Oh yes.  We had the great pleasure of re-watching this epic classic while some friends were visiting over the weekend.  It was quite the ancient reptilian treat.

I'll admit it: I still got antsy during the terrifying opening scene (this being the first time I actually watched it, without averting my eyes), and I still got goosebumps during the first Brachiosaurus reveal.  Somewhere deep within there still lives the complete dinosaur nerd I was as a child.  For being almost 20 years old (which, in turn, makes me feel old), the special effects in "Jurassic Park" hold up remarkably well.  The sick triceratops still seems bracingly real, and the climactic T-Rex v. Raptors fight is still incredibly dramatic and exhilarating.  Not to mention John William's score is still pitch perfect.

Raptors: pwned.
Brief aside: This movie, I'm sure, has definitely contributed to the warding-off-attack-by-scary-things dreams I have semi-regularly, even as an adult.  I'm typically barricading my home against zombies or vampires, but dinosaurs are definitely among the cast of characters in my head.  Clearly, if xkcd is any indication, I'm not alone in this.

Credit: The delightful xkcd.com
Beyond the surprising timelessness of the movie's special effects, I was struck by how strong the scriptwriting was.  There are SO MANY great one-liners in "Jurassic Park"!  It remains quite entertaining based on its many witticisms alone.

A selective sample:

On excrement: "That is one big pile of shit."


 On lawyer mockery: "Are those heavy?  Then they're expensive.  Put them back."

For the raptor lovers in the audience: "Clever girl!"

And, my personal favorite, BD Wong's fabulous lifting-pencil-from-clipboard flourish with the line: "You're implying that a group composed entirely of female animals will... [pencil lift] breed?"

Another brief aside: I have to say that I am desperately in love with BD Wong for many reasons, not the least of which being that a) he plays an FBI profiler on Law & Order: SVU (psychology swoon), and b) he made this, which makes me cry every time I watch it.  I love him love him love him.

Now, if I may daintily alight on my feminist soapbox for just a moment...

I think I've made it clear that I really do like this movie.  I really do.  It's an excellent piece of entertainment.  And I know it was made almost two decades ago.  It is therefore not wholly fair to hold it to the standards to which I would hold a movie made today.

...That being said, it is still irritating as hell that when Sattler marches off to find Arnold with Muldoon and Hammond attempts to go in her place, wordlessly reasoning with her that he should be the one to go, she snipes at him, "We can discuss sexism in survival situations when I get back!"  And then she DOESN'T TAKE A GUN INTO DINOSAUR TERRITORY, in spite of the fact that we just took a look at a rack full of them.  Instead, she takes a stupid giant flashlight with the universe's longest cable, which she will subsequently drag behind her all gimpily as she flees a raptor, blubbering like a big baby.

Gahhhhh.

I find this annoying for the following reasons:

1. I interpreted Hammond's protestations as age-based, not sex-based.  I may be misreading his intentions, but it does seem appropriate that a much older person--not to mention the dude who's essentially responsible for the mess everyone's in, unlike Sattler--should put themselves at risk, rather than someone with presumably decades of life still ahead of her.

2. Guns are typically interpreted as "male" manifestations of "power" in film, so GOD FORBID a woman should wield a gun.

3. It's just irritating to get all snotty with a dude who's trying to do the right thing, posturing as a self-sufficient feminist, and then fail to appropriately protect yourself (with non-gender-conforming weapons or no).  Sattler is contradicting herself without even realizing it.  It pisses me off.

That aside, seriously, this movie is definitely worth a re-watch.

With that... happy love day, everyone!

<3 <3 <3

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Waving "The White Ribbon," But Not The White Flag of Surrender

Well hello.

So it’s occurred to me that I haven’t been doing a great job of keeping everyone regularly appraised of my movie watching progress.  In the interest of greater transparency and also obligating myself to write posts more regularly, I think I’m going to start writing posts at the beginning of each month which include my net progress toward my 52 movie goal.

Thus far, 2011’s Movies Watched This Year List includes:
1. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (3)
2. I'm Still Here (2)
3. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (4)
4. The Fighter (4)
5. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (5)
6. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 (4)
7. Barney's Version (4)
8. The White Ribbon (5)

Please note, per my last post, the ridiculous preponderance of Harry Potter movies.  I’d be embarrassed if I weren’t still so deeply in the throes of my newfound fandom.  Holy shit those movies are fun!

But that’s as far as our Boy Wizard discussion will go for today, I’m afraid.  On to brighter and lighter things.  On to pre-World War I rural Germany.

Oh yes, what a party the people of that time and place were.

With Netflix’s recommendation, I recently watched “The White Ribbon” (2009), winner of the Academy Awards for Best Foreign Film and Best Cinematography that year.  I hadn’t really heard of it and am generally not drawn to German movies.  I lean more toward Swedes when I’m wanting to watch movies about cold blond people, partly out of ancestral deference, but also the fact that Ingmar Bergman was a god among men.  However, I’m very glad to have made the exception in this case. “The White Ribbon” is nothing short of mesmerizing.

 
To start, the award for Best Cinematography is well-deserved.  The crisp, stark, haunting images of the film wield surprising power for what is, at the end of the day, a rather quietly brooding film.  Plenty of disturbing events take place over the course of the movie, but we only ever learn of each of them after the fact, in brief glimpses and through subtle admissions of dark acts.  Shot in black and white, the movie achieves a sense of authenticity that immerses the viewer in the lives people led a century ago—their manner of dress, the frigid fastidiousness of their housekeeping, their stoic demeanors and stilted interactions.  I found myself wondering what their homes smelled like, how their coffee tasted, and how heavy the women’s dresses felt, giving the story a rare sense of proximity.  Underpinning this intimacy is a bold stillness in the camerawork, which refuses to move to follow the characters but rather allows them to approach at their own pace, creating a sense of tense contemplation.

It doesn’t seem to be much in vogue, but I find this school of cinematography immensely appealing—and not just because I’ve been literally nauseated by herky-jerky “Blair Witch Project” (1999)-style shooting on a number of occasions (see also: why I walked out of “Hancock” (2008)—also because it was terrible*).  I get that a lot of natural movement in filming is its own kind of vérité, an underpolished, messy approach to filmmaking that can be really brilliant in the right hands (see also: the French New Wave), but it can also be immensely distracting.  When done poorly, it merely serves to remind the audience that a person is filming this.  You are watching a movie.  In case you forgot, I’m going to move the camera around a lot.  Do you remember now?

It’s annoying.

On the other hand, intelligently and calculatedly placing a camera and simply letting it run as events swirl around it allows for what feels like a perfect self-effacement.  You forget you’re watching actors on a set and melt into the story, captivated by the nuances of their intonation and the emotions flitting across their faces.

So... I really enjoyed this movie, to my pleasant surprise.  It’s dark and unsettling, rich and fascinating.  It feels a little like Tolstoy, without the upper-crust pageantry and thousands of nicknames, but with the complexity of intrigue only possible with a large cast of characters and 144 minutes of film (or 1,000+ pages of text).


As you can see, I gave “The White Ribbon” a 5.  I highly recommend watching it.

Moving along: Second semester second year is in full swing.  I have at least one class I actually wholeheartedly enjoy, which is a godsend.  We’re required to take a seminar in analyzing and presenting our thesis data, which is a godsend of another kind—the more motivation I have to crank this shit out, the better.  I’m feeling really good about externship developments, and excited to learn where my classmates and I will be working next year.  We’re a pretty special bunch of people, so I have every confidence we’ll each be doing some pretty cool work.

And so far, I’m doing a moderately decent job of keeping my head on straight and making time to enjoy myself and the people I love a little more, to the tune of dinners, live bands, plays, and drinks... All around good things.  We’ll see if that holds true as the semester wears on, but at least I’m starting the year off on the right foot.

Until next time!

<3

* It must be said: I still love Will Smith, no matter what he does.  That man gave me “The Fresh Prince of Bel Air,” and nothing can ever take that away.